In Oakland, California, Breonna Taylor's statue was vandalized in an act of hatred, and now the community is furious.
The sculpture was installed two weeks ago in Latham Square near City Hall by Leo Carson, a sculptor. Breonna Taylor was a Kentucky woman killed during a police raid. "Say her name, Breonna Taylor" has become a civil rights call for justice.
Carson said he would rebuild the bust and has started a GoFundMe page to raise money to recast the art in bronze. On Sunday afternoon, the GoFundMe page had raised $3,370 from 73 donors, giving between $10 and $200 each.
On Sunday night, Joe Cotchett came forwarded and said his Burlingame law firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP, would fund the damaged sculpture's restoration.
Oakland police are still investigating an act of vandalism.
Check out our Patreon Page we would appreciate you signing up to become a member for as little as $1 Dollar a month click here to show that you support our community and want to help it grow.
Kyle Rittenhouse predicted to spend the rest of his life in prison after shooting three people — two fatally — during demonstrations in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Rittenhouse's friend Dominick Black, 19 is facing two felony counts of illegally providing Rittenhouse, 17, with the rifle — one count for each man who died.
Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, were the two protesters that were murdered that night and while Gaige Grosskreutz, 26, suffered a gunshot wound to his arm.
Black said that he had purchased the gun from a local hardware store in his name for Rittenhouse as he could not legally own a firearm.
Black Said: “I don’t know why ... the whole time I’m thinking, ‘He’s not 18,’” he told police. “In my head, like, I could have stopped it. But I know if I would have told him ‘no,’ he would have threw a fit.”
Black said he heard shots and then Rittenhouse called him to say he’d shot someone. Black’s statements about what his friend later told him about the shootings largely mirror Rittenhouse’s lawyers’ contention that the teen fired because people were attacking him and he feared for his life.
Black said he watched from the roof as Rittenhouse seemingly tried to turn himself in to police, but the officers did not arrest him. Black said Rittenhouse told him an officer had threatened to pepper-spray him during that exchange.
Black said that after the shootings, he and Rittenhouse met in a building and decided to leave Kenosha.
“It was like, ‘You know what, we’re gonna get in my car, we’re gonna drive out of here before anything bad else happens to you, and we’re just gonna go back home and you’re gonna go to the police station,’” Black said.
At one point, Black suggested he could eventually be held responsible for the shootings, even though Antaramian repeatedly stated he was not investigating the gun’s provenance and kept the tone of his questions amiable.
“Dude, I think I’m gonna be in more trouble than you because you defended yourself,” Black said he told Rittenhouse. “In all reality, you are not supposed to have that gun. That gun was in my name.”
Black said is not aware of any formal gun training Rittenhouse received and that his friend did not hunt.
Rittenhouse posted $2-million bond on Friday and was released from custody.
If you would like this content and gained value from this, please contribute any dollar amount you think is worthy. Venmo and Cash App
Sign up to become a Parton for exclusive content for as little as $1 Dollar a month click here to support.
The Essential Building Block of Anarchist Organization
Turbulent times are upon us. Already, blockades, demonstrations, riots, and clashes are occuring regularly. It’s past time to be organizing for the upheavals that are on the way.
But getting organized doesn’t mean joining a pre-existing institution and taking orders. It shouldn’t mean forfeiting your agency and intelligence to become a cog in a machine. From an anarchist perspective, organizational structure should maximize both freedom and voluntary coordination at every level of scale, from the smallest group up to society as a whole.
You and your friends already constitute an affinity group, the essential building block of this model. An affinity group is a circle of friends who understand themselves as an autonomous political force. The idea is that people who already know and trust each other should work together to respond immediately, intelligently, and flexibly to emerging situations.
This leaderless format has proven effective for guerrilla activities of all kinds, as well as what the RAND Corporation calls “swarming” tactics in which many unpredictable autonomous groups overwhelm a centralized adversary. You should go to every demonstration in an affinity group, with a shared sense of your goals and capabilities. If you are in an affinity group that has experience taking action together, you will be much better prepared to deal with emergencies and make the most of unexpected opportunities.
Affinity Groups are Powerful
Relative to their small size, affinity groups can achieve a disproportionately powerful impact. In contrast to traditional top-down structures, they are free to adapt to any situation, they need not pass their decisions through a complicated process of ratification, and all the participants can act and react instantly without waiting for orders—yet with a clear idea of what to expect from one another. The mutual admiration and inspiration on which they are founded make them very difficult to demoralize. In stark contrast to capitalist, fascist, and socialist structures, they function without any need of hierarchy or coercion. Participating in an affinity group can be fulfilling and fun as well as effective.
The Affinity Group is a Flexible Model
A particular team can act together over and over as an affinity group, but the members can also break up into smaller affinity groups, participate in other affinity groups, or act outside the affinity group structure. Freedom to associate and organize as each person sees fit is a fundamental anarchist principle; this promotes redundancy, so no one person or group is essential to the functioning of the whole, and different groups can reconfigure as needed.
Decide Your Appropriate Level of Security
Affinity groups are resistant to infiltration because all members share history and intimacy with each other, and no one outside the group need be informed of their plans or activities.
Once assembled, an affinity group should establish a shared set of security practices and stick to them. In some cases, you can afford to be public and transparent about your activities. in other cases, whatever goes on within the group should never be spoken of outside it, even after all its activities are long completed. In some cases, no one except the participants in the group should know that it exists at all. You and your comrades can discuss and prepare for actions without acknowledging to outsiders that you constitute an affinity group. Remember, it is easier to pass from a high security protocol to a low one than vice versa.
Pick the Scale That’s Right for You
An affinity group can range from two to perhaps as many as fifteen individuals, depending on your goals. However, no group should be so numerous that an informal conversation about pressing matters is impossible. You can always split up into two or more groups if need be. In actions that require driving, the easiest system is often to have one affinity group to each vehicle.
Go Into Action
Stop wondering what’s going to happen, or why nothing’s happening. Get together with your friends and start deciding what will happen. Don’t go through life in passive spectator mode, waiting to be told what to do. Get in the habit of discussing what you want to see happen—and making those ideas reality.
Without a structure that encourages ideas to flow into action, without comrades with whom to brainstorm and barnstorm and build up momentum, you are likely to be paralyzed, cut off from much of your own potential; with them, your potential can be multiplied by ten, or ten thousand. “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world,” Margaret Mead wrote: “it’s the only thing that ever has.” She was referring, whether she knew it or not, to affinity groups. If every individual in every action against the state and status quo participated as part of a tight-knit, dedicated affinity group, the revolution would be accomplished in a few short years.
An affinity group could be a sewing circle or a bicycle maintenance collective; it could come together for the purpose of providing a meal at an occupation or forcing a multinational corporation out of business through a carefully orchestrated program of sabotage. Affinity groups have planted and defended community gardens, built and occupied and burned down buildings, organized neighborhood childcare programs and wildcat strikes; individual affinity groups routinely initiate revolutions in the visual arts and popular music. Your favorite band was an affinity group. An affinity group invented the airplane. Another one maintains this website.
If you would like this content and gained value from this, please contribute any dollar amount you think is worthy. Venmo and Cash App
Sign up to become a Parton for exclusive content for as little as $1 Dollar a month click here to support.
A mother and father hurriedly ushered their children towards a minivan as a group of heavily armed men and women, some wearing camouflage, some dressed all in black, and most carrying a variety of firearms, converged on the steps of the capitol on August 30, 2020.
Although white armed militias show up to counter many racial justice protesters, openly carrying firearms, the general (re:white) public still isn’t used to seeing people of color, especially Black people, carrying guns. Many protesters do not normally exercise their second amendment rights.
“I want to make sure I keep myself safe when I’m going out protesting, and also say, hey, I can also express myself the same way that you can. I can speak your language. I can carry guns as well,” said John Sullivan, the organizer of the March on the Capitol protest and the creator of Insurgence USA and the Black Fist Militia.
Sullivan often openly carries when he protests, part of his ongoing efforts to “bring awareness to lawful intent and how the public views Black people.”
As unusual as it is to see armed protesters marching peacefully, especially those demanding an end to violence and government oppression, the real difference on this day was the feeling of the event, or the vibe.
Multiple “militias” marching did not segregate themselves, instead, uniting in solidarity and in a spirit of cooperation, to understand one another and to work toward common goals.
Sean Abundance, of the Utah Constitutional Militia (UCM) said,
“This is beautiful. This is what people all over the country need to do. Got somebody you don’t agree with? Guarantee you, you sit down and talk to them for 20 minutes, you’ll find something, some common ground. That much I can promise you.”
Participants from both sides of the political spectrum spoke about injustice, constitutional obligation, and about their own experiences with government oppression and unfair treatment.
“I want this country to live up to its ideals. I want this to be the land of the free. I want it to be the land of the free for everybody,” stated Josianne Petit, activist, organizer, and founder of Mama and Papa Panthers.
“I want our children to grow up together and not fear each other,” she continued.
Richard Bennett III, another member of Insurgence USA, addressed law enforcement and government officials directly, urging them to apply “every law and rule equally to every individual.”
“Then you will let our light shine,” he said.
A small group believed to be members of the Utah Citizens Alarm, an armed militia who often shows up to various events to intimidate protesters, initially heckled speakers and attempted to disrupt the event.
Individual UCA members with a history of making threats and inciting violence were not allowed to speak, but organizers allowed another member to speak after Petit challenged them at the microphone.
“It’s about time y’all be about something,” she said. “If you have an issue, create your own damn event and speak up there, and we do not troll y’all. But we’re going to be the bigger person and let you have the mic; just understand that this is how we feel about it.”
The UCA member who took the microphone said he doesn’t see any actionable plans from Insurgence organizers.
Sullivan responded, “The fact that you don’t know what our call to actions are and what we want to change through legislation and through police reform shows your lack of education and doing the proper research, because it’s out there. Right on our website.”
The event capped off with a march back to Washington Square, with a continued spirit of cooperation and concern for fellow participants.
Ultimately, attendees came away with exactly what they expected. Those seeking to divide were deaf to the messages, and those seeking to unite found common ground.
If you would like to help me keep fighting these injustices click here: Donate
Cash App and Venmo: @insurgenceusa
Photo credit: Jared Stanger
On August 25, 2020, the Facebook group Kenosha Guard hosted an event titled “Armed Citizens to Protect our Lives and Property” in Kenosha, Wisconsin. A post on the event asked, “Any patriots willing to take up arms and defend our city tonight from evil thugs?” and Kyle Rittenhouse and his assault rifle answered.
The event, which was organized in retaliation to the protests condemning the cold-blooded attempted murder of Jacob Blake, culminated with Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, firing his illegally acquired AR-15 into the crowd of peaceful protestors — murdering two people and critically injuring a third. He was not arrested until the next day, allowed to walk right past the police and travel back to his home state of Illinois.
Militia groups just like the Kenosha Guard have been appearing across the nation. Utah has seen its own share of these pop-up militia groups, one of the largest, which calls itself Utah Citizens’ Alarm, or “UCA,” has upwards of 15,000 members. The majority of these groups are made of white nationalists, angry and retaliating against the protests held to decry police brutality. This is of particular concern, as they pose a massive risk to our community. Without proper intervention, the risk of violence similar to what occurred in Kenosha grows by the day.
Before their Facebook page was removed for violating community guidelines, hundreds of threatening comments could be found on UCA posts, comments promising violence and death to protestors, chilling remarks such as, “run these no good terrorists over. why the hell are we putting up with this crap in this country. it’s time to start shooting these bastards,” from Dan Gotter; to direct threats of lynching from UCA member Ron Ward: “Hang em publicly”.
Utah Citizens’ Alarm and affiliated groups have been attending events across the state of Utah, armed and eager to instigate violence. They jeer at protestors and interrupt our speakers, barking hate and anger as we try to peacefully protest.
While the events crashed by UCA are innumerable, some are more noteworthy than others. The first event they counter-protested was in Provo, on June 29th — among their ranks were self-proclaimed Proud Boys (a far-right neo-fascist militia that was declared a hate group with ties to white nationalism by the FBI in 2018).
On August 3rd, UCA members made a particularly volatile appearance at a protest outside of the Cottonwood Heights Police Department, guns drawn and screaming in our faces, and then proceeded to stalk protestors to a vigil being held by Zane James’ friends to honor his life at Butler Park, right next to Impressions Preschool and Cottonwood Heights Middle School — where children were playing sports — strapped with their assault rifles and multiple magazines full of extra ammo.
The only thing that kept them from getting any closer to these children were protestors, putting themselves at great risk to protect those they did not even know.
Most recently, members have been aggressively disruptive at events in Salt Lake City. On the afternoon of August 30th, they showed up to “Power to the People: March to the Utah State Capitol” by Insurgence USA, and then the following day, to the event “Justice for Jacob Blake” held by the Salt Lake Equal Rights Movement.
Both of these peaceful events concluded early to avoid violence incited by members of these far-right militia groups and to ensure protestors were able to get home safely.
The similarities between Utah Citizens’ Alarm and the Kenosha Guard are glaringly obvious, and it seems to be only a matter of time before a member of UCA takes it upon themselves to shoot and kill protestors, no doubt emboldened by Kyle Rittenhouse’s heinous actions in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
These militias are violent hate groups, thinly veiling their racism and bloodlust behind the noble notion of “protecting their cities” — an ironic sentiment, considering they are the ones making our cities unsafe by spouting hate and waving their assault rifles around, while we are peacefully marching and organizing to condemn police brutality.
Why have racial justice protest numbers dwindled in the past few weeks? It is not a stretch to say it’s because of UCA and the fear they instill.
Intimidation in any sense is condemnable, but intimidation meant to - and succeeding in - curbing free speech, is especially heinous.
If you would like to help me keep fighting these injustices click here: Donate
Cash App and Venmo: @insurgenceusa
Police officers from at least nine different Utah police departments converged on Provo, Utah, on Saturday, Aug. 15, in preparation for Insurgence U.S.A.’s protest, End Police Brutality: Hold the Drivers Responsible, held later that day.
A video taken by Josianne Petit, a local Utah County activist, only a few hours before the protest started shows police vehicles from Salem, Mapleton, Lehi, Orem, Spanish Fork, Provo, Lone Peak, Bluffdale, and Springville police departments at the Provo Rec Center, only a few blocks away from the Provo Police Department, where the protest was held.
“This is deescalation in the minds of the police. Do you see why we protest? Do you get it now?” Petit said in the video.
The live stream of the protest from organizers’ phones shows a steady stream of police officers patrolling the blocks around the police station and protest. Attendees estimated at one point, there were 50 police officers present.
Stephen Mattei, a protester who consistently helps out with security at various protests, even reported snipers on top of nearby buildings.
“The police claimed they were aware of the snipers and they were not a threat,” says Mattei.
“They wouldn’t confirm or deny if it was a police sniper, even after I told them I felt a sniper is a serious threat and that I would need to know if I needed to start moving people out of there.”
The purpose of Saturday’s protest was to draw attention back to the drivers of cars who tried to run protesters over in Provo on Monday, June 29, 2020. The Provo Police Department has not apprehended the drivers, and in conjunction with Provo Mayor Kaufusi, even released a promotional video on social media associating the peaceful protesters with violence, claiming to “set the record straight.”
Since June 29, local militias have sprung up in Utah County, using social media to quickly amass nearly 20,000 members. The most prolific group, Utah Citizens Alarm, attends almost all of Insurgence U.S.A.’s protests fully armed with assault rifles and handguns, in the guise of “protecting” everyone involved.
“UCA was antagonistic as always,” Mattei says about Saturday’s protest. “Their members played music and Martin Luther King speeches from a car stereo, trying to drown out speeches.”
Mattei says the police seemed friendly with UCA, joking around and letting UCA’s drone fly in the same space as their own surveillance drone.
ACLU Utah and University of Utah Law professors have said UCA’s actions at protests are “concerning” and can be intimidation meant to curb free speech.
“I think what disturbed me the most was the sheer waste of taxpayer dollars an operation like that must have cost,” Mattei continues, speaking of the police. Protest attendees were about 12 in number, small enough for three to four officers to handle.
“But they immediately brought in every available unit and had SWAT on standby. I could tell they were not interested in keeping the peace, so much as intimidation.”
Despite the disproportionate police and civilian militia presence, the protest remained peaceful. Speakers shared personal experiences they had with racism, police brutality and misconduct, ranging from personal experiences and betrayals from the Provo Police Department, to Sandy Police officers killing a man in the middle of a mental health crisis.
A local resident shared how she has treated police officers both physically and psychiatrically in her work at a local hospital, but has never seen any requests from the department for information relating to an officer’s psychological fitness to be on the force or carry a firearm.
The protest ended with rallying cries to “Respect my existence, or expect my resistance!”
As attendees left, organizers approached a coffee shop across the street and joined the shop’s open karaoke night. John Sullivan, founder of Insurgence U.S.A. and an organizer of the protest, says coffee shop employees had asked him to join their karaoke earlier in the evening. Originally, he says he declined because that wasn’t why he was out protesting.
“But then I was like, why not? What a good way to get involved with the community. They approached me and were fearless; they weren’t scared of who I was,” he says.
Sullivan wore his AR-15 throughout the protest, part of his ongoing effort to “bring awareness to lawful intent and how the public views Black people.” He wanted to make people uncomfortable so they open up their minds and realize that just because he has a gun, doesn’t mean he’s violent.
He says some individuals at the coffee shop gave him strange looks, but the majority were friendly, including some remaining police officers.
“Some of the patrolmen who were out on the street taking orders were just told that I’m a violent person. But then they see me go and sing karaoke, come up and shake my hand, and they realize, this is kind of ridiculous.”
Sullivan sang “Best I Ever Had” by Drake.
If you would like to help me keep fighting these injustices click here: Donate
Cash App and Venmo: @insurgenceusa
The sad reality is that the activism community is not what it seems. My first thought would be that everyone wants to join together in the fight to end Racial Discrimination and Police Brutality. I was quickly shown that this was not the case.
I had organizations reach out to me and tell me if I did not see eye to eye on their methods that we could not work together. Most of these were other white organizers trying to capitalize on their stance in the movement. Some were black organizers with a power trip only seeking clout in this movement rather than effectively making change.
Then rumors and false information were spread about me and used to discredit my character and integrity. This was done by Community Organizers, White Supremacist Groups, Government Entities, and even Family Members. With no regard for the validity of the information presented and no factual evidence to back it up either.
I have been called a:
I received thousands of death threats with people saying
I have had white supremacy groups follow me home, park outside, and my house. It got to the point where I and the other organizers in my group had to buy bulletproof vests, and guns to protect our self's.
I wanted to write this because I needed to shed light on the toxicity that is in our community. That we can not effectively create change and destroy this hatred from our culture if we are not on a unified front!
Join us in the fight: https://www.insurgence.us/become-a-member.html
How Does a Racist White Militia Get Away With Pepper-Spraying a Veteran with PTSD and A Black Woman? When Peaceful Protesters Get Slapped With Felonies.
By: John Sullivan
Founder of The Black Fist Coalition
On August 7, 2020, Black Lives Matter supporters rallied at the Cottonwood Heights Police Department. They were protesting against the police brutality shown to peaceful protesters in Cottonwood Heights just five days earlier. During this protest, they were met with opposition by a group called Utah Citizens’ Alarm (UCA), which was formed to protect the community from “violent” protesters.
The protesters formed in the middle of the square, surrounded by the white militia group. Many of the Utah Citizens’ Alarm members tried to instigate responses from the Black Lives Matter organization.
An older UCA member stood, lifting his shirt to expose his hairy white chest, rubbed his stomach. Other UCA members tried to force themselves into the crowd to cause conflict with protesters. Armed individuals encircled the group, carrying AR 15s, shotguns, bats, and other weapons.
Thanks to the composure and tolerance of the protesters, the protest remained mostly peaceful for a time. As the event concluded, many of the protesters left to go home. A few individuals stayed, including a former Marine. UCA started making various noises that sounded like gunshots, and the veteran had a PTSD attack. Witnesses say the source of the noises was clear: Landon Buttars, a long term member of UCA, had assaulted multiple people with pepper spray.
On-site law enforcement did not intervene in this altercation until many of the protesters approached them with videos of the incident. They then detained the Buttars temporarily, but later released him on no charges.
Now, this wouldn't be an issue if the Blue Pigs held everyone accountable for their actions.
When protesters simply march through the street, Utah district attorneys collaborate with police to slap them with rioting charges, a third-degree felony in Utah. Other protesters, further expressing their frustration, pour red paint onto the street outside a corrupt district attorney’s office, and now face life in prison because of first-degree felony charges of “gang enhancement.”
Time and time again, the police show their internal bigotry when they uphold the law. Salt Lake City Mayor Mendenhall’s Executive Order 5 on police reform validates protesters by exposing huge issues within Utah law enforcement, issues that demand immediate attention. But why release these new policies now? Why not two months ago, a year ago, or even a decade ago? These are long-standing issues that require societal change on every level, more than just press releases that read like publicity stunts.
We want to reiterate our concern to local lawmakers, including Salt Lake City Mayor Mendenhall:
Landon Buttars assaulted multiple people on August 7, including a veteran with PTSD, making him more criminal and violent than any of the protesters the district attorneys have slammed with felony charges. The fact Buttars was let go with no charges is absurd.
If a person of color or other protesters expressing their first amendment right were to do what Buttars did in self-defense against white supremacists or violent cops, they would be arrested. They would be slapped with charges that far outweigh the actual offenses. This is not speculation, it is fact because far more peaceful individuals than Buttars have been charged and face life in prison.
We call on Salt Lake City Mayor Mendenhall, Cottonwood Heights Mayor Michael Peterson, and elected officials all around the state to use their political clout to uphold justice for protesters expressing their first amendment rights and to unroot police brutality, corruption, and racism in every corner in Utah. We have had enough of the double standards benefiting white supremacy, and enough of political passivity in the name of moderation. It is time to take action.
Official Press Release - August 7, 2020
The socio-political climate throughout the country has been in upheaval since the death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020. We have seen protests across every state and throughout the entire world on his behalf.
On June 9, 2020, Salt Lake City, Utah took a major step, formalizing a policy that prohibited the use of chokeholds by the Salt Lake City Police Department. Mayor Mendenhall and the City Council took another big step on August 3, 2020—implementing new policies protecting civilians and police officers alike.
These are significant changes that will see the state of Utah taking massive strides forward in regard to how we handle police brutality and officers wrongly accused. The Black Fist Coalition would like to address Executive Order 5, pointing out the things done successfully, as well as specific suggestions we have for improvement.
Our Concerns, Summarized
Who defines what qualifies as the necessary use of force? What is considered to be a reasonable use of force? Who will dictate what qualifies as unreasonable in the use of de-escalation tactics? We would like the use of real-world examples to illustrate these, making it clear, for the public and officers alike, as to what to avoid.
How will the outlined policies be enforced? What will happen if an officer does not comply? Will officers who refuse to comply in one city be allowed to work in another city?
This Executive Order did not address No-Knock Warrant policies that many police departments have in place. We have many concerns about the safety of civilians and the risks officers may face upon entering a home without knocking. Due to the Second Amendment and Utah’s Castle Doctrine, the possibility of officers getting mistaken as dangerous intruders is high, and the likelihood of officers getting shot at by civilians exercising their right to self-defense increases. Mayor Mendenhall has previously addressed working to overhaul no-knock warrants, and to put stricter rules in places. Where does our state now stand on this issue?
We would also like to address qualified immunity for police officers. Officers hold a significant amount of power and responsibility. They hold the lives of our citizens in their hands. This is not a duty that should be taken lightly. Allowing officers qualified immunity puts communities at risk and allows more reckless behavior from officers, putting other members of the force at risk as well as our people. We need to end qualified immunity now so that there is legal precedent to prosecute officers who engage in criminal use of force and corruption.
There is a great need for a Civilian Review Board to be created. Checks and balances of power elevate our country away from tyranny. With a neutral, elected, diverse board in place to balance the power of the police departments, our communities can only benefit. The police are currently a self-regulatory organization. Removing this pressure would also be beneficial for the force, by lessening the pressure put upon police supervisors, lessening the possibility of corruption, and ensuring safety for everyone.
Another request we would like to put forth is reallocating some police funding. Evidence shows that if we better fund at-risk communities, especially in regard to education, housing, mental health resources, and accessibility, we would see crime rates noticeably drop. This would not only be beneficial to poorer populations but would also help to keep our officers safe.
Overall, we are proud to see such a document created in our state. We look forward to seeing its policies put into action. We are pleased that our state stands for justice and freedom, and we are excited to continue creating positive change alongside our elected officials.
Section 1. Use of Force (Policy 300)
Supreme Court Case Graham v. Connor (1989) is referenced in the initial order. This case rejects the notion that all excessive force claims are able to be governed by a single generic standard. This language leaves it to the discretion of officers what can be considered “objectively reasonable” force.
We implore that the parameters surrounding when force may be deemed necessary be defined and held to a strict standard, with few circumstantial exceptions. The use of loose language is cause for concern, as it is due to officer discretion that excessive force is used so often.
Also stated is that officers must always use de-escalation tactics before using force. What de-escalations tactics and techniques are officers going to be taught? What sort of training regimens will they be subject to? Will this training be consistently relearned and updated? We ask out of concern for the well-being of officers and citizens alike. Training in de-escalation techniques is a matter applying to public safety, but to officer safety as well, ensuring that officers not be subjected to unjust treatment; socially, physically, or lawfully.
The closing statement; “Officers will have an affirmative, individual duty to ensure their own compliance with this policy as well as the conduct of other officers.” Asks the question, what happens if officers refuse to comply with this measure? How will these regulations be enforced?
300.2.1 Duty to Intercede
We are glad to see an affirmation of an established policy to intercede. We also appreciate the shift from expectation to intercede with observation to reasonable belief that inappropriate force may be used.
We would also like to know who defines what is considered if force is “excessive” or “unnecessary”. This is obviously very subjective and will vary from case to case, but is this something that fellow officers will decide? We are concerned that this runs the risk of officers allowing things to slide and allowing rules to be bent. A solution to this issue would be to create an elected, diverse Civilian Review Board to go through the actions of officers and decide, case by case, if force was necessary, or if disciplinary actions need to be taken.
This is an important measure to take for public and officer safety. Ensuring that there are solid rules, parameters, limitations, etc. applied to these measures helps protect civilians against possible police corruption and brutality.
We request that, alongside this measure, safety nets be put into place to protect officers who speak up against their more corrupt partners. There are cases in which speaking up against the corruption in their departments ended with cops getting fired. While there are many, two examples of this are Cariol Horne (Buffalo, New York) and Regina Tasca (Bogota, New Jersey). In 2006, Horne stopped an officer’s chokehold on a suspect in handcuffs. The department pressed disciplinary charges against her for this, before finally firing her in 2008.
Tasca responded to a mental health crisis in 2011--another officer came to the scene as well and began to punch the victim. Tasca intervened, following the rules dictated by the department, “the responsibility of law enforcement to take steps possible to prevent or stop the illegal or inappropriate use of force by other officers”. Tasca was suspended, then subjected to disciplinary reviews and psychological evaluations. She was fired in 2012.
Following just rules and doing what is morally right should never result in punishment, especially in cases like these. We want those who are there to uphold the law and keep our communities safe to be protected from such corrupt retaliation.
300.3.1 Use of Force to Effect an Arrest
Requiring that de-escalation tactics become mandatory is something that we are excited to see. Something that caused concern, however, was the phrase, “unless unreasonable.” We are concerned about the open-ended possibilities of what can be defined as reasonable or unreasonable. This vague language could allow corrupt officers to use loopholes to get away with injuring or killing suspects. We also want precise, situational examples of the different uses of de-escalation, and at what point it is considered “unreasonable” to continue trying to de-escalate a situation.
300.5 Deadly Force Applications
We are glad to see this shift in policy. We recognize that had this been implemented sooner, it could have saved the life of Bernardo Palacios-Carbajal, which saddens us. These sorts of policy shifts can be difficult to implement, and we are very happy that this change is being made so that there are no future victims of this type of brutality within our state. However, we are curious how “necessary” and “imminent” will be defined within this policy. Again, these words are subjective, and we want to be sure no officer interprets it in a way that harms civilians.
300.8 Reporting the Use of Force
Including details about use of force and how situations are handled in their reports will be a very positive change to this policy. It would also be beneficial if all details are required with all incidents that are reported. This will protect the officers from liability issues.
We would like to voice our concern that there is the possibility of officers making excuses when critical and non-critical cases occur. We request that if these policies are not followed, the officer refusing to follow protocol be criminally investigated by an outside agency and elected Civilian Review Board, as refusal to comply suggests corruption, or that the involved officer may be attempting to conceal criminal activity.
300.9 Medical Consideration
Alongside ensuring that an officer should not obstruct an individual’s breathing, we’d like to request that officers are medically trained in order to not damage an individual’s airway or any other organs. We also request that other medical conditions be taken into consideration, such as asthma, mental illness, and environmental factors (e.g.: hot pavement, heat stroke, dehydration, frostbite, etcetera.) This requires that the officer engage an individual in conversation to find out if the individual has any specialized medical conditions. Taking the time to find out such things also helps de-escalate a situation and prevents officers from acting with inappropriate force out of reflex.
Proper training in how to handle these situations will be beneficial to officers and the public alike, as they can take care of officers down, while also knowing how to help at risk individuals. We want to ensure that we are doing all we can to ensure the safety of our community.
300.10 Investigating Uses of Force
The requirement of two levels of supervisors reviewing all uses of force is great. However, it would be wise to require investigation of all instances of force, even if a situation does not involve critical injury. Officers have a significant amount of power, which comes with more responsibility. As service workers are under full surveillance with less power, we feel that officers should be held to an even higher standard. More power should equal more accountability, not less.
We are also concerned that a review by supervisors may not be sufficient to keep abuse of power in check. There is an unknown amount of corruption within the policing system. Again, we need elected, diverse Civilian Review Boards in place to go over these actions as well. The United States was built upon the idea of checks and balances, of keeping one group from having too much power over any other. Having a separate review board with the power to make lasting disciplinary decisions would apply this constitutional principle to the police force.
(New Subsection) Tactics Preceding Use of Force
This is a fantastic new policy. Implementing this will see a massive decline in cases of police brutality and civilian retaliation. As civilians are untrained in emotional control under stress, it’s natural for civilians to respond defensively when treated with aggression from police officers, which leads to escalation, prompted by police aggression.
Therefore, aggression, and aggressive behavior, needs to be strictly defined, and training needs to be rigorous and enforced.
However, is police officers’ aggressive response to protestors also covered under this policy? Because when there is no riot occuring, officers dressed in riot gear who respond to protestors constitute aggressive behavior and escalate a peaceful protest to one in which civilians need to defend themselves against brutality and excessive force. Perhaps police officers need to be further trained in the definition of a “riot.”
Protesting in a street does not equate a riot. Dancing in the street in protest does not equate a riot. Protesters using their voices to call for accountability in police forces does not equate a riot. These actions are not tumultuous, violent, or cause public alarm, unlike police showing up at a peaceful protest with riot gear and tear gas. In these cases, it is the police who ought to be guilty of a riot.
(New Subsection) No Deadly Force in Self-Harm Cases
We are extremely relieved to hear that a policy protecting individuals under extreme mental duress is finally being put in place. We are hopeful that other states will follow our lead and protect those who need help over violence.
However, we express doubts over the ability of police officers to discern, diagnose, and treat individuals in mental and emotional duress. Policies which prohibit officers from using force are good. But it would be infinitely better if police officers were not the first responders in such situations. This is where trained social workers need to come in and replace police officers. They deal with emotionally and mentally unstable individuals every day of their jobs and are trained to respond peacefully to take control of the situation. We urge the Salt Lake City and Unified Police Departments to hire more social workers and send them as first responders to mental health crises.
Section 2: Search and Seizure (Section 310)
This policy, while a good start, does not delve deep enough into the issue to create any solid change in the way situations requiring search and seizure are handled. Utah currently has a law enforcing Implied Consent (Utah Code 41-6a-520). If this is not repealed, this new search and seizure policy will not be properly enforced.
Additionally, what happens if a camera is not available to the officer at the time, or if their body camera is broken? Will their word that explicit consent was given be applicable? How will this policy be enforced? There is the potential for much officer misuse of this policy unless additional measures are taken.
Section 3. Body Worn Cameras (Policy 422)
Specific disciplinary action against officers who fail to have their cameras on is a fantastic start. Cameras are an incredibly important part of keeping our communities safe. We want everyone to be protected, and having cameras to ensure we receive the full story of an incident will be an immense step towards that. If an officer is truly in danger, camera footage will help corroborate their story.
Cameras need to be mandatory at all times for this protection to be truly applicable. If cameras are removed or turned off while an officer is on the clock, there needs to be an immediate disciplinary review—while on the clock, officers should have nothing to hide from the public, just as medical, retail, and food personnel do not. Any time that an officer feels their camera needs to be off should be considered possibly criminal, just as it would be for any other frontline worker.
Additionally, this policy alludes to disciplinary action; we are curious to know what sort of discipline will roll out, and how it will be decided if discipline is necessary. If these things are decided by fellow officers, we worry that discipline will not be stringent enough. Will this be something that is monitored by an outside party? For this sort of situation, a Civilian Review Board would be exceptionally useful and necessary.
We also have concerns in regard to this policy and the recently passed SB 210—allowing the deactivation of body cameras for “confidential information”—this allows officers to use their own discretion as to when a camera can be turned off. We fear this allows far too much room for possible unlawful activity, as well as potential danger to our officers in the field. While we understand possible concern around confidential footage being made public domain, we also believe that all footage does not need to be made public record; but for the safety of all parties, on-duty officers would benefit from having their activity recorded and reviewed when necessary. With SB 210 in place, there are far too many possible exceptions to this improved mandate, allowing it to mean very little and cause very little change without strict enforcement.
An often heard reason for the lack of camera footage is that cameras malfunctioned or were broken. In regard to this issue, we suggest officers be required to wear multiple cameras, and that the cameras are subjected to consistent maintenance, updates, and charging. This will greatly lessen the likelihood of breakage, malfunction, and battery drainage. The cameras ought to be a part of an officer’s uniform, not to be removed or turned off while on duty under any circumstances.
The Black Fist Coalition strives to make an impact on the local Utah community and on the world by taking a stance against acts of inhumane violence, political corruption, and discrimination of any form.
If you would like more information on this topic, please email email@example.com
Insurgence USA decided to hold a protest against police brutality and racial discrimination in Provo, Utah on June 29th, 2020. Our full intent was to go out and spread awareness. When we went out we decided to meet outside the Provo Police Station. There was also a Blue Lives Matter Rally happening at the same time. The organizer of that rally even said they were just doing a food drive and there would be no protesting. Unfortunately, that was not the case.
The Blue Lives Matter people were gathered together on the street with their big trucks, flying the Blue Lives Matter flags, and honking at us the entire time. There was no drive-by of food donations that day as we stood there facing them. Then, all of a sudden, they got in their trucks, turned around and left.
At that point, we started questioning:
Where did everybody go in such a rush? I knew that they were going to come back, and they all left at once. Were they going to come from behind our group? The way they left seemed systematically planned, with one car following behind the other.
Unfortunately, my assumption was right, but I did not see that until 20 to 30 minutes later. As we started to march down Center Street, the Blue Lives Matter people had gone home. But as I realized later, some only went home to change their cars or license plates, to make it look like they were different people.
You see, what they failed to realize is that you should remove your Blue Lives Matter sticker off the back of your bumper, if you’re going to try to pass as a different driver in a different car. I saw cars trying to run us over that were exactly the same as the ones at the Blue Lives Matter rally. There is no coincidence that those cars were trying to run us over in Provo; they went home, and traded their big-ass trucks in for minivans so that they could run us over!
But who actually showed up? Just the ambulance.
Where was the Provo Police Department when we needed them?
After marching up University Avenue, we came back to our meeting spot outside the Provo Police Station. We prepared to leave but were instead greeted by policemen in riot gear. The amount of time it took them to put on riot gear instead of coming to an emergency situation is baffling, to say the least, especially when people were trying to run over protesters with cars!
Now, the right-wing media would like to tell you a different narrative about the shooting, about how the protesters were trying to incite violence. That is completely inaccurate. We stated before, during, and after our protests that we came with peaceful intent to spread the message of unity and equality!
After that night, a group of racist white supremacists fabricated further rumors against us! They gained around 7,000 members in under 24 hours and now, just a couple of weeks later, have over 15,000 members in their Facebook group. This group, Utah Citizen’s Alarm, claims they are for peace and justice.
But they meet us at our protests with AR-15s and tactical gear as if we are terrorists. Their whole organization is built on propaganda and fear. They say our organization is led by a riot communist leader. The fact that they even built a petition around arresting our leader for doing nothing more than organizing a peaceful protest is sickening. The members of their organization are nothing less than morally unsound.
For anyone to say that I or Insurgence is against the United States of America is bullshit. I was training for the Olympics to represent my country for years. To say that my organization embodies those beliefs is just delusional. Unfortunately, it is easier to believe lies then it is to do the research yourself, to understand who someone really is. Casey, the leader of the racist Utah Citizens Alarm group, is nothing but a manipulative, white supremacist leader. He is a living example of everything that we are fighting against.
The members of his organization are sick. People within their community say that they will hang Black people from trees. They say they will go home, get their cars, and run people over in the streets. Perhaps it’s even out of curiosity, one member wanting to see if Black people bleed just like white people do. I guarantee you, we do.
I see no peacefulness in those comments. I see no peacefulness in using and manipulating my own brother to speak out against me. No real man that wants peace will go out of their way to create such conflict and contention between two groups or especially between family members.
If Casey and UCA were really about peacefulness and unity, they turn the other cheek just like Jesus did, and embrace the protesters and the causes we are fighting for.
I hope this provides everyone a little bit more insight into how the local media portrays Black people in our community as criminals, terrorists, and as riot communist leaders. They use it to suppress us by running with their own narrative.
Our country was not founded on the freedom of African-American People. Our country was built on racism and discrimination which we had to fight to overcome. Even after the Constitution supposedly gave us equal rights, we still had to fight for those rights. We are still fighting for those rights.
Passing laws does not erase racism within people’s hearts and minds. What happened in Provo only solidifies that statement and unveils it to our community’s eyes.
We still have so much work to do, and unfortunately, even the police department in Provo, Utah supports the systemic racism that we see today.
Open your motherfucking eyes! Climb out from underneath your goddamn couch where you hide and watch Netflix, and instead, see what is going on in this world. See what is going on inside your own community. And then do something to fix it.
Hold the drivers and the police responsible! Sign this petition: http://chng.it/HwRmm6ZPK6
I hope that you will join us on July 27th in Provo Utah:
If you would like to support our cause please feel free to donate below: